ATRA Research Article
Research Abstract
Overview
Methodology General procedure: 24 Subjects were interviewed in a Hispanic community center by bilingual interviewers, allowing for culturally sensitive interaction. Information necessary for the evaluation of cognitive functioning was collected in the form of the neurological clock drawing task (Clock Drawing Test- sensitivities: up to .86; specificity: up to .96). The Clock Drawing Test (CDTs) were blindly and independently scored by three raters, using the clock drawing interpretation/scoring system described by Sunderland et al. Participants were also given a pre and post self-report known as the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), pertaining to the frequency of everyday deficits in attention, perception, memory, and motor coordination (CFQ-internal validity: 0.91; test-retest reliability rate: 0.82). Additionally, personal and demographic information was collected at the onset of the investigation, including education, age, gender, country of origin, date of immigration to U.S., and level of social support. Art therapy sessions were provided weekly. The experiment duration totaled 12 weeks. Participation in creative activity as a factor of cognitive functioning: The statistical significance of the variables was examined using the program SHAZAM ( P < .05). Dependent variable: Difference in pre/post scores. Independent variable: Number of art therapy sessions attended. Results: A total of 8 variables were taken into account. Those variables included: age, country of origin, gender, education level, duration spent in the US, frequency of self-directed art making, living arrangements, and attendance to art therapy sessions. Only attendance to art therapy sessions was found to have a significant correlation to cognitive evaluation test scores. Correlations among activity and cognitive performance: Cognitive performance scores for both the CFQ and CDT were positively and significantly correlated to participation in art therapy sessions. (The p-values were .010 and .021 respectively). The second pilot studies were conducted by fourth year students at St. Thomas Aquinas College at Bergen Regional Medical Center, the Alzheimer’s locked Unit. These two studies investigated the subjective responses to the TTAP Method vs. daily recreation therapy sessions. The primary aim of the study was to examine four overall questions 1) Did individuals feel the TTAP sessions increased their overall feelings of quality of life? 2) Did the sessions positively affect their personal needs? 3) Did the sessions enhance verbalization? 4) Does the TTAP Method naturally increase opportunities for cognitive stimulation in programming? This research study followed an experimental design. Each TTAP Method session was followed with post session questions from the Farrington Leisure Evaluation Scale (adapted for this research study). This format allowed investigation of the hypothesis that those individuals with moderate AD could evaluate and give feedback regarding their likes and dislikes of the multimodal art/recreation activity. This hypothesis predicts that dynamic, mentally stimulating multimodal approach is essential at any stage of the disease process and can have an overall affect on psychosocial wellbeing, increased verbalization and enhance cognitive stimulation. General Procedure conducted for Bergen Regional Medical Center: 4 students were assigned to 6 residents (consent forms were administered through legal guardians with IRB approval) diagnosed with moderate levels of Alzheimer ‟s disease. For seven weeks students meet with the same 6 individuals, and designed a different multimodal TTAP Method session each week for 1 • hours. At the end of each session students utilized a modified version of Farmington‟s Leisure Evaluation Scale (using 1-5 Lickert Scale) and open ended questions, to attain responses from the participants regarding “their voice” in the overall evaluation of each session. The results were tabulated by the students as part of the Research Methods Course in Therapeutic Recreation at St. Thomas Aquinas College, using SPSS software for data analysis.
Results:
Implications:
References 1. Gurland, B., Wilder, D., Lantigua, R., Stern, Y. & Chen, J. (1999). Rates of dementia in three ethno-racial groups. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(6), 481– 493. 2. National Institute on Aging, Progress Report on Alzheimer‟s disease. (2005). NIH Publication No. 05-5724. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.alzheimers.org/pr04-05/index.asp 3 Kumara, R., Dearb, K., Christensenb, H., Ilschnerb, S., Meslinb, S. & Sachdevc, P. (2005). Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in 60- to 64-Year-Old Community-Dwelling Individuals: The Personality and Total Health through Life 60+ Study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 19, 67-74. 4. Manly, J., Tang, M., Schupf, N. & Stern., Y. (2005). Implementing diagnostic criteria and estimating frequency of mild cognitive impairment in an urban community. Archives of Neurology, 62, 1739-1746. 5. Pressley, J., Trott, C. & Tang, M. (2003). Dementia in community-dwelling elderly patients: a comparison of survey data, medicare claims, cognitive screening, reported symptoms, and activity limitations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 896-905. 6. Davie, J., Azuma, T., Goldinger, S., Connor, D., Sabbagh, M. and Silverberg, N. (2004). Sensitivity to expectancy violations in health aging and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology, 18(2), 269-275. 7. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Zamarron, M.D., Tarraga, L., Moya, R. & Iniguez, J. (2003). Cognitive plasticity in healthy, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects and Alzheimer‟s disease patients: A research project in Spain. European Psychologist, 8(3), 148-159.
8. Rentz, C. (2002). Memories in the Making©: Outcome-based evaluation of an art
|
|







